opinion

Enhancing the Image of Porn

During my daily romp around the XBiz boards I noticed a thread entitled "Air-brushing right or wrong" – so I stepped in to the thread for a look see to get an idea of what people were saying. The majority seems to feel that airbrushing in porn is acceptable, since the adult industry sells fantasies...

I can accept this as being pretty accurate. The problem that I have is that airbrushing is not limited to the adult industry. It is being done in some form for all magazine covers and advertising campaigns. If airbrushing was limited to porn only then theoretically only adults would have viewing access, and most adults are aware that the image they are seeing has been enhanced for their viewing pleasure. However, when it happens in the mainstream media, then everyone including children views the enhanced images.

As a mother of three young girls this concerns me. What is this doing to their self-image? Are they going to hold themselves to these unattainable high standards of beauty without realizing that what they are seeing has been digitally altered? Are young boys also being brainwashed into thinking that their first girlfriends should look like a cover girl? I realize that altering photos has been going on for quite sometime, but I was shocked to realize how drastic a change airbrushing can make.

In almost every advertisement we see there is an image of what a woman should look like. She is always shaped nicely usually with the perfect hourglass figure, smooth skin, big beautiful eyes, long hair, and a deliciously kissable mouth.

Do we, as a society, really think that we can put this "ideal" image out there and not expect our daughters to try to achieve it? How can we teach them to love the bodies that they have if their bodies vary differently form the "ideal"? There is such a concern over this that the Advertising Educational Foundation is hosting a symposium on October 18th entitled, "How is Advertising Shaping the Image of Women?" For additional information on the symposium, which is being held in Chicago, visit https://www.aef.com.

Is there a line drawn as to how much a photo can be enhanced? Is it right to correct a woman’s flaws when our imperfections are what make each of us unique? Let’s take Cindy Crawford for an example. Her beauty mark is what made her stand out from the crowd of supermodels, would she be as famous today if someone decided to digitally remove her ‘imperfection’? Probably not.

We as a society have spent billions of dollars on trying to be more beautiful. I think that women are much more susceptible to this than men. Is there a woman amongst us who has not taken a magazine photo to the hairstylist and said "I want this haircut?" We flock to the make-up counters to try the latest anti-wrinkle cream, we suffer through painful waxings, squeeze into foundation garments and clothing that we can’t breathe in, spend hours obsessing over bad hair days all in the effort to make ourselves more attractive.

I am as guilty of this as the next person and I am not saying that we should stop this. I am suggesting that maybe it is time to widen the focus. Every one of us is unique in some way and each one of us has a different perception of beauty. Maybe it is time that our marketing campaigns begin reflecting this. In recent years there have been a number of companies that have started making strides in this and I congratulate them on their efforts. These companies include Nike, Revlon, and Hanes Her Way. There is still more that needs to be done.

In recent years there has been a public outcry over the amount of violence our children are being exposed to and concern over how this is affecting their development. As a result, a rating system is now in effect not only for movies but television programming, music, and games as well. Maybe if we as a society get together and decide to voice the same concern over the issue of a child’s self-esteem, someone smarter than me will come up with a solution.

As to the question of Airbrushing right or wrong? I can’t answer that. As a newbie to the adult industry I can understand the selling point behind airbrushing out the imperfections. As a woman, I can say that I wish someone could airbrush me each day before I walked out the door. As a Mom, I would have to say that I am against the process.

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

opinion

TeamSkeet Debuts Swappz Channel, 'Swapception' Feature

Chief Revenue Officer Brandon explains, “The inspiration behind ‘Swappz’ emerged from a growing market demand for niche adult content that pushes boundaries and explores the taboo themes and deal-striking handshakes of swaps.”

Alejandro Freixes ·
profile

WIA Profile: Samantha Beatrice

Beatrice credits the sex positivity of Montreal for ultimately inspiring her to pursue work in adult entertainment. She had many friends working in the industry, from sex workers to production teams, so it felt like a natural fit and offered an opportunity to apply her marketing and social media savvy to support people she truly believes in and wants to see succeed.

Women In Adult ·
opinion

Understanding the Latest Server Processors

Over the last decade, we mostly stopped talking about CPU performance. Recently, however, there has been a seismic and exciting change in the CPU landscape, due to innovation by a chip company called Advanced Micro Devices (AMD).

Brad Mitchell ·
opinion

User Choice, Privacy and the Importance of Education in AV

As we discussed last month, age verification in the adult sector is critical to ensuring legal compliance with ever-evolving regulations, safeguarding minors from inappropriate content and protecting the privacy of adults wishing to view adult content.

Gavin Worrall ·
opinion

Maintaining Payment Processing Compliance When the Goalpost Keeps Moving

VIRP is the new four-letter word everyone loves to hate. The Visa Integrity Risk Program went into effect last year, and affects several business types — including MCC 5967, which covers adult and anything else with nudity, and MCC 7273, dating services that don’t allow nudity.

Jonathan Corona ·
opinion

Making the Most of Your Sales Opportunities

The compliance road has been full of twists and turns this year. For many, it’s been a companywide effort just to make it across that finish line. Hopefully, most of us can now return our attention to some important things we’ve left on the back burner for months — like driving revenue.

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

Disruptive Films Unfurls Taboo Sex Banner 'Deviants'

Disruptive Films is well known for its kinky and taboo storylines. Now, the studio looks to unfurl Deviants: a new brand that shows taboo sex in a different light, diverging from the often-grim tone of traditional kinky fare to present a new vision.

Alejandro Freixes ·
profile

YourPaysitePartner Marks 25-Year Anniversary Amid Indie Content Renaissance

For 25 years, YourPaysitePartner has teamed up with stars and entrepreneurial brands to bring their one-stop-shop adult content dreams to life — and given the indie paysite renaissance of the past few years, the company’s efforts have paid off in spades.

Alejandro Freixes ·
opinion

WIA Profile: B. Wilde

B. Wilde considers herself a strategic, creative, analytical and entertaining person by nature — all useful traits for a “marketing girlie,” a label she happily embraces.

Women In Adult ·
opinion

Proportionality in Age Verification

Ever-evolving age verification (AV) regulations make it critical for companies in the adult sector to ensure legal compliance while protecting the privacy of adults wishing to view adult content. In the past, however, adult sites implementing AV solutions have seen up to a 60% drop in traffic as a result.

Gavin Worrall ·
Show More