trends

Visa Cracks Down on ‘Shell’ Billing Firms

Visa Cracks Down on ‘Shell’ Billing Firms

There was a time not so long ago when website operators created billing companies in favorable jurisdictions, whose sole purpose was to bill customers for services provided by the operator and remit the settled funds to the operator.

The customer was typically indifferent to the identity and location of the billing company, so long as the payment went through and the products or services were delivered.

The increased scrutiny of cross-border transactions, along with the new Visa restrictions, may require substantial business restructuring by some website operators.

However, credit card associations have become increasingly insistent that merchants have a physical location and be organized where business is actually conducted. Concerns with consumer protection, fraud, and money laundering have now resulted in tighter restrictions on the identification and location of merchants’ operating companies.

In August, Visa issued a clarification of its core rules regarding the location of merchant outlets. Effective in October 2016, any merchant outlet involved in electronic commerce is required to have a permanent establishment through which transactions are completed. If only digital goods are sold, the merchant must use the country where the principles of the company actually work.

The merchant must also hold a valid business license, maintain a local address and pay applicable sales taxes. The merchant’s address for cardholder correspondence must be clearly displayed on the checkout screen, along with various shipping and refund/cancellation policies.

Presumably, these rules prohibit website operators from simply incorporating a billing company in a jurisdiction like the U.S., if the principles work in other locations.

Moreover, “shell” corporations with no business license or physical address would be prohibited from serving as a merchant’s operating company.

More recently, based on information from multiple sources inside the payment processing industry, Visa EU intends to implement new rules that are scheduled to take effect on Jan. 31.

These rules carry potentially heavy burdens for affected merchants and sub-merchants, as they will require companies to show a presence in their country of incorporation and to also retain at least some of their processing funds there rather than settle all those funds to another jurisdiction.

Non-compliance with these restrictions can be crippling. A first violation carries a €50,000 fine, albeit suspended until the end date of the cure period. A second violation within 12 months of the first is €100,000, with monthly increase thereafter of €150,000 above the prior month’s accumulated penalties (e.g., at month three; €300,000 and so forth).

The new rules can be summarized as follows:

1. The merchant’s country of incorporation must be within the acquirer’s territory;

2. A majority of the merchant’s directors must be in the acquirer’s territory;

3. The merchant must have a valid address in its country of incorporation, within the acquirer’s territory; the incorporation agent’s addresses cannot be used;

4. The merchant must pay corporate tax, sales tax or VAT as required by its country of incorporation (within the acquirer’s territory);

5. The merchant must have a bank account to be used for settlement purposes in a country within the acquirer’s territory;

6. The domain name must be owned by the merchant or a parent, sister or subsidiary of merchant;

7. The merchant must disclose its location before the customer completes the card transaction, either on the checkout screen or on a screen in the checkout sequence;

8. The terms and conditions must clearly state that the services are provided to the customer by the merchant, and by no one else, and that all inquiries or complaints be directed to the merchant; and

9. Merchants that are not compliant by Jan. 31 can be subject to fines (see above for the fine schedule).

The increased scrutiny of cross-border transactions, along with the new Visa restrictions, may require substantial business restructuring by some website operators.

Given the relatively brief window before these rules take effect, affected operators should consult with their business, accounting, and legal professionals promptly to begin compliance planning.

Lawrence G. Walters, Esq., heads up Walters Law Group and has represented website operators for over 25 years. Nothing contained in the foregoing article is intended as legal advice. Please consult individual legal counsel with any questions or concerns.

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

profile

WIA Profile: Reba Rocket

As chief operating officer and chief marketing officer of Takedown Piracy, long at the forefront of intellectual property protection in adult entertainment, Rocket is dedicated to safeguarding the livelihoods of content creators and producers while fostering a more ethical and sustainable industry.

Women In Adult ·
opinion

Protecting Content Ownership Rights When Using AI

In today’s digital age, content producers have more tools at their disposal than ever before. Among these tools, artificial intelligence (AI) content generation has emerged as a game changer, enabling creators to produce high-quality content quickly and efficiently.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

How Payment Orchestration Can Help Your Business

An emerging payment solution is making waves in the merchant world: the payment orchestration platform (POP). It’s quickly gaining traction as a powerful tool for managing online payments — but questions abound.

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

Fine-Tuning Refund and Cancellation Policies

For adult websites, managing refunds and cancellations isn’t just about customer service. It’s a crucial factor in maintaining compliance with the regulations of payment processors and payment networks such as Visa and Mastercard.

Jonathan Corona ·
profile

WIA Profile: Laurel Bencomo

Born in Cambridge, England but raised in Spain, Laurel Bencomo initially chose to study business at the University of Barcelona simply because it felt familiar — both of her parents are entrepreneurs. She went on to earn a master’s degree in sales and marketing management at the EADA Business School, while working in events for a group of restaurants in Barcelona.

Women In Adult ·
profile

Gregory Dorcel on Building Upon His Brand's Signature Legacy

“Whether reflected in the storyline or the cast or even the locations, the entertainment we deliver is based on fantasy,” he elaborates. “Our business is not, and never has been, reality. People who are buying our content aren’t expecting reality, or direct contact with stars like you can have with OnlyFans,” he says.

Jeff Dana ·
opinion

How to Turn Card Brand Compliance Into Effective Marketing

In the adult sector, compliance is often treated as a gauntlet of mandatory checkboxes. While it’s true that those boxes need to be ticked and regulations must be followed, sites that view compliance strictly as a chore risk missing out on a bigger opportunity.

Jonathan Corona ·
opinion

A Look at the Latest AI Tools for Online Safety

One of the defining challenges for adult businesses is helping to combat the proliferation of illegal or nonconsensual content, as well as preventing minors from accessing inappropriate or harmful material — all the more so because companies or sites unable or unwilling to do so may expose themselves to significant penalties and put their users at risk.

Gavin Worrall ·
opinion

Know When to Drop Domains You Don't Need

Do you own too many domains? If so, you’re not alone. Like other things we accumulate, every registered domain means something to us. Sometimes a domain represents a dream project we have always wanted to do but have never quite gotten around to.

Juicy Jay ·
opinion

Understanding 'Indemnification' in Business Contracts

Clients frequently tell me that they didn’t understand — or sometimes, even read — certain portions of a contract because those sections appeared to be just “standard legalese.” They are referring, of course, to the specialized language used in legal documents, including contracts.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
Show More