opinion

What’s the Story With the New gTLDs?

Recently, several members have asked for an update on ICANN’s new gTLD program and the timeline for its implementation. However, there is not an easy answer, because as with all things ICANN, the gTLD program is mired in confusion and uncertainty.

Here is what we do know. On June 13, the gTLD application window closed. ICANN received 1930 applications for 1409 new gTLDs. Many of these proposed gTLDs will be of interest to the adult community: .shop, .store, .buy, .chat, .date, .dating, .blog, .forum, .group, .gay, .lgbt, .movie, .video, .film, .hot, .love, .sexy, .sex, .adult, .porn, and 66 geographic names — just to list those that jumped out at me.

Evaluation of the applications is happening currently and will continue until May 2013.

However, since that time, ICANN’s gTLD application system had to be shut down because it exposed the personal information of applicants. ICANN hired a new CEO. The New gTLD Program Director resigned. ICANN’s process for handling the applications had to be scrapped because it was vulnerable to legal challenge, and U.S. legislators “persuaded” ICANN to extend the public comment period. Obviously, ICANN’s original implementation plan is no longer applicable.

So, where does that leave us? Well, today, in an attempt to answer that question, ICANN published “Roadmap for Processing New gTLD Applications.” The Roadmap lays out a timeframe for the next phase of the program. According to the Roadmap, the public comment period is currently open and will remain open until Sept. 26.

Evaluation of the applications is happening currently and will continue until May 2013. During this time, evaluators perform the following functions: determine if the applicant meets the technical requirements, determine if the applicant meets the financial requirements, consider and evaluate any formal objections, consider GAC (Governmental Advisory Committee) advice, and analyze the string for confusing similarity to existing strings. The results of the evaluations will be published in June 2013.

Between July 31 and Dec. 19, ICANN will develop a system for processing the applications. The U.S. government will not allow ICANN to add more than 1000 gTLDs to the root. If more than 1000 gTLDs pass the evaluation, ICANN must have a system for choosing the 1000 that will be added, one that can stand up to legal challenge — which they don’t currently have.

If an applicant passes the evaluation, if there are no competing applications for that string, and if the applicant is selected by ICANN’s still-to-bedefined process for selecting the 1000, then the applicant would move on to contract execution in August 2013. However, if there is more than one applicant for that particular string, then that string moves on to auction.

So, the answer to the original question is that the absolute soonest we will see any of these gTLDs go live is September 2013. However, a word of caution: based on five years of experience working with ICANN, the road ahead is not likely to be smooth.

Related:  

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

profile

WIA Profile: Samantha Beatrice

Beatrice credits the sex positivity of Montreal for ultimately inspiring her to pursue work in adult entertainment. She had many friends working in the industry, from sex workers to production teams, so it felt like a natural fit and offered an opportunity to apply her marketing and social media savvy to support people she truly believes in and wants to see succeed.

Women In Adult ·
opinion

Understanding the Latest Server Processors

Over the last decade, we mostly stopped talking about CPU performance. Recently, however, there has been a seismic and exciting change in the CPU landscape, due to innovation by a chip company called Advanced Micro Devices (AMD).

Brad Mitchell ·
opinion

User Choice, Privacy and the Importance of Education in AV

As we discussed last month, age verification in the adult sector is critical to ensuring legal compliance with ever-evolving regulations, safeguarding minors from inappropriate content and protecting the privacy of adults wishing to view adult content.

Gavin Worrall ·
opinion

Maintaining Payment Processing Compliance When the Goalpost Keeps Moving

VIRP is the new four-letter word everyone loves to hate. The Visa Integrity Risk Program went into effect last year, and affects several business types — including MCC 5967, which covers adult and anything else with nudity, and MCC 7273, dating services that don’t allow nudity.

Jonathan Corona ·
opinion

Making the Most of Your Sales Opportunities

The compliance road has been full of twists and turns this year. For many, it’s been a companywide effort just to make it across that finish line. Hopefully, most of us can now return our attention to some important things we’ve left on the back burner for months — like driving revenue.

Cathy Beardsley ·
profile

YourPaysitePartner Marks 25-Year Anniversary Amid Indie Content Renaissance

For 25 years, YourPaysitePartner has teamed up with stars and entrepreneurial brands to bring their one-stop-shop adult content dreams to life — and given the indie paysite renaissance of the past few years, the company’s efforts have paid off in spades.

Alejandro Freixes ·
opinion

WIA Profile: B. Wilde

B. Wilde considers herself a strategic, creative, analytical and entertaining person by nature — all useful traits for a “marketing girlie,” a label she happily embraces.

Women In Adult ·
opinion

Proportionality in Age Verification

Ever-evolving age verification (AV) regulations make it critical for companies in the adult sector to ensure legal compliance while protecting the privacy of adults wishing to view adult content. In the past, however, adult sites implementing AV solutions have seen up to a 60% drop in traffic as a result.

Gavin Worrall ·
opinion

Goodbye to Noncompete Agreements in the US?

A noncompetition agreement, also known as a noncompete clause or covenant not to compete, is a contract between an employer and an employee, or between two companies.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

The Search for Perfection in Your Payments Page

There has been a lot of talk about changes to cross sales and checkout pages. You have likely noticed that acquirers are now actively pushing back on allowing merchants to offer a negative option, upsell or any cross sales on payment pages.

Cathy Beardsley ·
Show More