ACLU Attacks FCC

LOS ANGELES — The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), along with a variety of other groups, has issued a statement to the U.S. Supreme Court, claiming that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) lacks the authority to regulate non-obscene speech.

The groups claim that the FCC's practice of deciding what or isn't "decent" amounts to "unconstitutional censorship."

The move was prompted by an FCC action challenging a lower-court's overturning of its claim that Fox Television aired a "fleeting indecency" during a Billboard Awards show.

The Amicus Curiae was filed by The American Civil Liberties Union; The New York Civil Liberties Union; American Booksellers Foundation For Free Expression; American Federation Of Television And Radio Artists; Directors Guild Of America; First Amendment Project; Minnesota Public Radio/American Public Media; National Alliance For Media Arts And Culture; National Coalition Against Censorship; National Federation Of Community Broadcasters; Pen American Center; and Washington Area Lawyers For The Arts; and asks the Supreme Court to evaluate the FCC's decency-enforcement rules, stating that "no agency should be given such power under the constitution."

Part of the controversy surrounds the issue of a potential violation of the Administrative Procedures Act by the FCC, since it is claimed that the Commission did not give the nation's broadcasters sufficient notice that brief, unexpected profanities would be fined.

"The entire indecency regime, in light of 30 years' experience, can no longer be justified by any constitutionally permissible construction of the statute," the brief declared.

"Technological developments since Pacifica [a Supreme Court decision that upheld the FCC's authority] indicate that the rationale for censorship of non-obscene broadcasting has lost whatever persuasive force it once may have had," stated the brief. "Given cable television, the Internet and other electronic media today, broadcasting is no longer 'uniquely pervasive' and 'uniquely accessible to children.'"

The brief didn't call into question the role of the Commission in regulating the broadcast spectrum, which is a finite resource that requires governmental management, but only its role in determining the appropriateness of the content delivered over the airwaves.

"There is surely a difference between structural rules designed to promote more speech and censorship rules based on broad, shifting and culturally driven criteria such as 'patent offensiveness,'" the brief stated.

View Document

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

AV Bulletin: Age Verification Hits the Mainstream, Ofcom Sets a Date

Industry stakeholders and free speech advocates have anxiously been awaiting the Supreme Court’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, which could significantly impact state age verification laws around the country. In the meantime, state legislatures continue to weigh and pass AV bills, AV tech providers continue to tout their services, and legal challenges continue to play out in the courts — with some cases on hold pending the SCOTUS ruling in Paxton.

Arcom Reports Age Verification Enforcement Actions Against 5 Adult Sites

French media regulator Arcom released a statement Tuesday detailing recent actions to enforce age verification rules as set forth under France’s Security and Regulation of the Digital Space (SREN) law.

Ron Jeremy's Accusers Reach Settlement With Rainbow Bar & Grill

The Rainbow Bar & Grill has reached confidential settlements with a group of women who filed a negligence lawsuit against the Sunset Strip restaurant over alleged sexual assaults committed by Ron Jeremy, according to Rolling Stone.

Sportsheets Joins FSC as Gold Member

Sportsheets has joined Free Speech Coalition (FSC) as a Gold-level member.

AV Bulletin: Two End Runs, Two Failed Bills

Industry stakeholders and free speech advocates have anxiously been awaiting the Supreme Court’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, which could significantly impact state age verification laws around the country. In the meantime, state legislatures continue to weigh and pass AV bills, AV tech providers continue to tout their services, and legal challenges continue to play out in the courts — with some cases on hold pending the SCOTUS ruling in Paxton.

FSC Helps Defeat Colorado AV Bill

Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has announced that, with its help, Colorado's recently introduced age verification bill has been defeated.

Missouri AG Bypasses Legislature, Declares Age Verification Rule

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey on Wednesday announced a new state regulation requiring adult sites to implement age verification of users, bypassing the legislative process in a strategy not seen before in state-level efforts to mandate age verification.

Attorney Corey D. Silverstein Launches 'Q&A Series' on Social Media

Adult industry attorney Corey D. Silverstein has launched a Q&A series on his social media platforms.

'Over the Top' North Carolina Bill Could Play Havoc With Adult Sites

A bill filed in the North Carolina state Assembly on Monday would impose new rules that industry observers warn could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Swedish Government Proposes Ban on Purchasing 'Remote' Sexual Services

The Swedish government has asked the country’s Parliament to amend Swedish law so that current laws against purchasing sexual services would also apply to acts performed remotely by cammers, streamers and custom content creators.

Show More