Obscenity Bill in Kansas Could Expose Educators to Prosecution

TOPEKA, Kan. — A new measure being considered by the state legislature would remove educator exemptions from Kansas’ obscenity laws and require teachers there to receive approval from their local school board to use any teaching materials that could be considered legally obscene.

The state’s current obscenity law holds that it is a “defense to a prosecution for obscenity” if the allegedly obscene material was “purchased, leased or otherwise acquired by a public, private or parochial school, college or university, and that such material was either sold, leased, distributed or disseminated by a teacher, instructor, professor or other faculty member or administrator of such school as part of or incident to an approved course or program of instruction at such school.”

An amendment to Senate Bill 492 (SB492) proposed by Sen. Karin Brownlee, R-Olathe, would introduce new language to existing state law that “a teacher shall not read, use or display in a school any material for which an affirmative defense to prosecution may be asserted” under the state’s law prohibiting the promotion of obscenity, unless “such use, reading or display has been approved by the board of education of the school district in which such school is located.”

The original purpose of SB492 was to change state law to allow a person convicted of a misdemeanor driving under the influence charge to obtain a teaching license in Kansas, something which is currently prohibited in the state. Brownlee’s amendment introduced the language concerning the display of possibly obscene materials, and would hold school principles responsible for allowing teachers to use materials not approved by the school board.

In support of her measure, Brownlee has cited a 2005 controversy in the Blue Valley School District as evidence of need for the new law. That controversy involved a petition signed by approximately 500 residents in the Blue Valley district who demanded the removal of 14 “vulgar” novels from the district’s high school reading list. The offending novels reportedly included Toni Morrison’s “Beloved” and Cormac McCarthy’s “All the Pretty Horses.”

Brownlee has said that she recognizes that not everyone will agree on what constitutes “obscene” literature or viewing material, but asserted that Kansas residents have a right to their own standard.

“What’s acceptable in San Francisco may not be in Kansas,” Brownlee recently said during testimony before the House Education Committee. “Let the school board set the community standard.”

Jeffrey Douglas, chairman of the Free Speech Coalition (FSC), told XBIZ that Brownlee’s bill is “entirely unnecessary,” and added that it is very hard to imagine that any teacher would display material in a classroom that would it would be possible to successfully prosecute as legally obscene.

The state’s legal definition of obscenity is virtually identical to the Miller test, which defines the federal obscenity standard. Under Kansas law, material or performances are deemed to be obscene if “[t]he average person applying contemporary community standards would find that the material or performance, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest; the average person applying contemporary community standards would find that the material or performance has patently offensive representations or descriptions of … ultimate sexual acts, normal or perverted, actual or simulated, including sexual intercourse or sodomy, or … masturbation, excretory functions, sadomasochistic abuse or lewd exhibition of the genitals; and taken as a whole, a reasonable person would find that the material or performance lacks serious literary, educational, artistic, political or scientific value.”

Douglas noted that however unlikely it is that any book or other teaching material used by teachers could successfully prosecuted as obscene, the language of Brownlee’s amendment can be interpreted to apply to any book that could be accused of being obscene, regardless of the prospects for a successful obscenity prosecution.

If the bill were to pass in its current form, the result would be a “chilling effect” that trickled down from the school board and into the classroom, Douglas said. Out of fear of upsetting parents in their district, school boards could be reticent to approve any remotely sexually explicit materials to be used in the classroom, thereby reducing the scope of both literature and sex education materials for teachers to use.

Douglas said he thinks the bill is most likely a political maneuver, and not an attempt to address an actual pressing need to curb the display of allegedly obscene materials in the state’s classrooms. He also predicted that the bill would never make it to Governor Kathleen Sebelius for her signature.

“These kinds of laws aren’t created to address a problem, but to create the impression that there is a problem in the first place,” Douglas said. “It is unfortunate but commonplace for legislators in one branch to suggest bills that they know will never pass the other [branch]. Doing this creates the appearance that they are doing something proactive, and leaves the responsibility for the measure being rejected on somebody else.”

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Project 2025 Leader Claims Big Tech Companies 'Deliberately Fuel Pornography Addiction' Among Men

Heritage Foundation president and Project 2025 leader Kevin Roberts published on Wednesday the text of a speech in which he persists with his past claim that “predatory Big Tech corporations” are “deliberately fueling pornography addiction” among young men.

FSC Petitions 10th Circuit for Review of Utah AV Dismissal

Free Speech Coalition (FSC) on Wednesday petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit to review a decision handed down earlier this month by a three-judge panel of the same appeals court, which denied FSC the right to challenge Utah’s controversial age verification law by suing state officials.

MyAdultAttorney's Corey D. Silverstein to Hold Post-Election Legal Impact Webinar

Industry attorney Corey D. Silverstein will hold a “Legal Impact” webinar titled “We Have a New U.S. President: Legal and Community Implications” on Nov. 12 at 1 p.m. PST.

Pornhub Shuts Down Access in Oklahoma Over Age Verification

Aylo began geo-blocking Pornhub across Oklahoma on Tuesday, three days in advance of the state’s new age verification law, SB 1959, taking effect.

Florida Age Verification Law Faces Legal Challenge

Tech industry trade groups NetChoice and the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) filed a lawsuit Monday challenging Florida’s HB 3, which includes a requirement for adult websites to verify the age of site visitors in the state.

Scotland Pushes Partnership With Anti-Porn Activist Who Thinks Sex Workers Are 'Possessed by the Devil'

A leading sex worker advocacy group in the U.K. reports that the Scottish government has instructed local authorities to partner with controversial Christian charity Azalea, led by a religious anti-porn activist who has stated that sex workers are “possessed by demons.”

#HandsOffMyPorn Campaign Ramps Up Anti-Project 2025 Ads on Barstool Sports, Similar Sites

The digital ad campaign #HandsOffMyPorn will up its spend from $200,000 to $500,000, and run all-new pre-roll spots on male-centric websites like Barstool Sports, GQ, Men's Health and Bleacher Report.

'Daily Caller' Column Condemns 'e-Harlots,' Urges 'Nuking' Porn Sites

In a column published Friday, the Tucker Carlson-founded right-wing news site Daily Caller advocates for the censorship of adult content, using extremely derogatory terms to describe adult creators and calling for “nuking” porn sites to achieve a “complete and total shutdown.”

UK Government Report Downplays Online Safety Act's Potential Impact on Porn Sites

The U.K. government released on Wednesday a new report assessing the likely impact of implementing the provisions of the controversial Online Safety Act (OSA), revealing adult industry concerns that a standalone provision directly targeting porn sites will render their operation in the U.K. “not feasible.”

'European Conservative' Editor Urges Total Porn Ban

One of Europe’s leading right-wing publications, the European Conservative, published an editorial this week claiming that “anti-porn activists have essentially won the public argument that pornography is poisoning our society” and calling for a total porn ban.

Show More