South Dakota Prison Porn Ban Challenged by Inmate

South Dakota Prison Porn Ban Challenged by Inmate

SIOUX FALLS, S.D. — This week, federal judges for the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered a district court judge to address a controversial South Dakotan law banning pornography in prisons.

The restrictive policy, which was established in 2014 and last updated in May 2017, prohibits any material featuring nudity or sexual content. This broadly encompasses any “pictorial or other graphic depiction where male or female genitalia, pubic area, buttocks or female breasts are exposed.”

The rule is so ill defined that it covers both actual pornography as well as novels and nude works of classical art. The Argus Leader reported that “several Renaissance pictures of works of Michelangelo[‘s]” were confiscated along with manga and the novels “Thornes of Desire” and “Pride and Prejudice: The Wild and Wanton Edition.” Under this rule, inmates found with such material are subject to “disciplinary action.” 

The ban even covers outgoing letters, a point of contention for Charles Sisney, the inmate bringing the case to court and whose books and art were confiscated. Sisney’s lawyers said that the restriction on mail violates his First Amendment rights. 

Gizmodo reported that constitutional scholar Steven Morrison, who argued some of the case in court, told The Daily Republic, “Prisoners do not give up their First Amendment rights. If a prison can show that restricting material protected by the First Amendment is related to a penological interest such as security or safety, the courts tend to give wide discretion to prisons, as they should. But there’s no evidence of that in this case. It is literally unprecedented. The policy prohibits an entire class of speech, sexually explicit content, and goes beyond that. There are no exceptions.”

Sisney began the fight soon after the rule was established and eventually won support from the ACLU of South Dakota and the National Coalition Against Censorship. He appealed a 2016 ruling by the district court even though it largely landed in his favor; it has since been vacated due to being based on an older, less restrictive policy made in 2000 and not the 2014 version.

For now, Sisney must wait for the decision to be made — without his books and without his art.

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

AV Bulletin: Age Verification Hits the Mainstream, Ofcom Sets a Date

Industry stakeholders and free speech advocates have anxiously been awaiting the Supreme Court’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, which could significantly impact state age verification laws around the country. In the meantime, state legislatures continue to weigh and pass AV bills, AV tech providers continue to tout their services, and legal challenges continue to play out in the courts — with some cases on hold pending the SCOTUS ruling in Paxton.

Arcom Reports Age Verification Enforcement Actions Against 5 Adult Sites

French media regulator Arcom released a statement Tuesday detailing recent actions to enforce age verification rules as set forth under France’s Security and Regulation of the Digital Space (SREN) law.

Ron Jeremy's Accusers Reach Settlement With Rainbow Bar & Grill

The Rainbow Bar & Grill has reached confidential settlements with a group of women who filed a negligence lawsuit against the Sunset Strip restaurant over alleged sexual assaults committed by Ron Jeremy, according to Rolling Stone.

Sportsheets Joins FSC as Gold Member

Sportsheets has joined Free Speech Coalition (FSC) as a Gold-level member.

AV Bulletin: Two End Runs, Two Failed Bills

Industry stakeholders and free speech advocates have anxiously been awaiting the Supreme Court’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, which could significantly impact state age verification laws around the country. In the meantime, state legislatures continue to weigh and pass AV bills, AV tech providers continue to tout their services, and legal challenges continue to play out in the courts — with some cases on hold pending the SCOTUS ruling in Paxton.

FSC Helps Defeat Colorado AV Bill

Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has announced that, with its help, Colorado's recently introduced age verification bill has been defeated.

Missouri AG Bypasses Legislature, Declares Age Verification Rule

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey on Wednesday announced a new state regulation requiring adult sites to implement age verification of users, bypassing the legislative process in a strategy not seen before in state-level efforts to mandate age verification.

Attorney Corey D. Silverstein Launches 'Q&A Series' on Social Media

Adult industry attorney Corey D. Silverstein has launched a Q&A series on his social media platforms.

'Over the Top' North Carolina Bill Could Play Havoc With Adult Sites

A bill filed in the North Carolina state Assembly on Monday would impose new rules that industry observers warn could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Swedish Government Proposes Ban on Purchasing 'Remote' Sexual Services

The Swedish government has asked the country’s Parliament to amend Swedish law so that current laws against purchasing sexual services would also apply to acts performed remotely by cammers, streamers and custom content creators.

Show More