Spencer Gifts Battles Clark County Over Right to Sell Sex Toys

Spencer Gifts Battles Clark County Over Right to Sell Sex Toys

LAS VEGAS — Last summer, Spencer Gifts received notice that it could face both criminal charges and maximum daily fines of $500 if it didn’t stop selling sex toys at two of its Las Vegas stores.

Instead of giving in to Clark County code enforcement authorities and removing the numerous items identified, the Delaware-based novelty retailer decided to challenge the notice and filed a federal lawsuit last month.

Spencer Gifts’ lawsuit claims that the county’s zoning laws, which categorize the stores as illegally located “sex novelty shops,” amount to prior restraint violating the First Amendment.

Local zoning laws only allow sex novelty shops in several areas of unincorporated Clark County — inside Las Vegas Strip hotel-casinos and west of Las Vegas Boulevard running along Interstate 15.

The Spencer Gifts stores at the center of the suit are in downtown Summerlin and at the Las Vegas Outlet Center, near McCarran International Airport.

Yesterday, Clark County officials answered Spencer Gifts’ civil rights suit, stating that the subject ordinance is not vague and that the decision by the county’s Board of Commissioners was reasonable and done in the public interest.

County official also said that Spencer Gifts wasn’t denied a liberty interest under the 14th Amendment to engage in a particular vocation or trade.

Spencer Gifts, in its complaint, said that the county was violating the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause because retail giants like Walmart, Walgreens and Albertsons are allowed to sell vibrators without repercussion.

During an October appeal of the “sex novelty shop” categorization, Spencer Gifts’ general counsel Kevin Mahoney said the stores carry a small stock of sex toys and that staff ensures they stay out of the hands of children.

But Mahoney wasn’t convincing. Commissioners voted unanimously to deny the appeal.

According to a report, Clark County attorney Robert Warhola told commissioners they had the discretion to only go after Spencer’s due to the store’s wider selection of sex toys and novelties.

“If you go to Spencer’s it’s much more obtrusive. It’s very explicit,” Warhola said. “There’s no comparison to pharmacies.”

The case, Spencer Gifts v. Clark County, continues at Las Vegas federal court.

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Honey Play Box Introduces Red 'Puff' Kegel Trainer

Honey Play Box has debuted a new red edition of its Puff kegel trainer.

CB-X Unveils 'Guarded Galaxy' Chastity Kits

CB-X has unveiled its new Guarded Galaxy glitter chastity kit collection.

New Pleasure Product Review Site 'ToyChats' Launches

ToyChats.com, a pleasure product review and discussion site, has officially launched.

Pipedream Debuts PDX Elite 'Moto-Bator Pro' Stroker

Pipedream Products has introduced its new PDX Elite Moto-Bator Pro masturbator.

Our Erotic Journey Introduces New Packaging

Our Erotic Journey has debuted new packaging for re-releases of its top-selling products.

Pipedream Debuts Jimmyjane 'Touch-Me Pro' Vibe

Pipedream Products has introduced the new Touch-Me Pro vibrator from its Jimmyjane line.

Ron Jeremy's Accusers Reach Settlement With Rainbow Bar & Grill

The Rainbow Bar & Grill has reached confidential settlements with a group of women who filed a negligence lawsuit against the Sunset Strip restaurant over alleged sexual assaults committed by Ron Jeremy, according to Rolling Stone.

Full Circle Debuts Stroker Collection, Love Torsos

Pleasure brand Full Circle has introduced its new Blue Jean Girls stroker line and Royal Honeys love torsos for wholesale distribution.

Sportsheets Joins FSC as Gold Member

Sportsheets has joined Free Speech Coalition (FSC) as a Gold-level member.

Age Verification Watch: Two End Runs, Two Failed Bills

Industry stakeholders and free speech advocates have anxiously been awaiting the Supreme Court’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, which could significantly impact state age verification laws around the country. In the meantime, state legislatures continue to weigh and pass AV bills, AV tech providers continue to tout their services, and legal challenges continue to play out in the courts — with some cases on hold pending the SCOTUS ruling in Paxton.

Show More