U.S. Appeals Court Expands Right to Search Laptops

SAN FRANCISCO, Calif. — Business trips just got more complicated for those relying on laptop computers.

In a boon to prosecutors, a federal appeals court has ruled that U.S. guards at international borders may search and seize the contents of laptop computer files without probable cause.

The ruling last month by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals stemmed from the case of a suspended lawyer and former judge who was stopped by Canadian border authorities in 2004 when he landed in British Columbia on business following a stay in Las Vegas.

Stuart Romm appealed lower court decisions to the 9th Circuit after he was found guilty of child porn images that were retained in a cache folder.

When Romm passed through Canadian customs, authorities found a 1997 Florida conviction for soliciting sex from an undercover agent posing as a 14-year-old on the Internet.

He was denied entry and sent back to U.S. authorities in Seattle who conducted a search of his computer, finding deleted child porn cache images.

Romm admitted to authorities that he visited child porn sites, viewing and enlarging the pictures during a stay in Las Vegas, but later deleted them from his computer.

At trial, the government said it used EnCase software to recover deleted files as well as information showing when the files were created, accessed or modified.

Based on 40 images deleted from his Internet cache and two images deleted from another part of his hard drive, Romm was convicted of knowingly receiving and possessing child porn in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252A(a)(2), (a)(5)(B).

Romm appealed both of these convictions, as well as his concurrent mandatory minimum sentences of 10 and 15 years.

The 9th Circuit was called to decide whether, absent a search warrant or probable cause, the contents of a laptop computer may be searched at an international border and, if so, what evidence is sufficient to convict its owner of receiving and possessing child porn.

The federal appeals court agreed with the government’s case, holding that authorities “forensic analysis of Romm’s laptop was permissible without probable cause or a warrant under the border search doctrine.”

It also held that there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find the images in Romm’s Internet cache were visual depictions, and that he both received and possessed these images.

The court affirmed his convictions, but remanded the case back to the lower court.

The case is U.S. vs. Romm, No. 04-10648.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

AV Bulletin: Age Verification Hits the Mainstream, Ofcom Sets a Date

Industry stakeholders and free speech advocates have anxiously been awaiting the Supreme Court’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, which could significantly impact state age verification laws around the country. In the meantime, state legislatures continue to weigh and pass AV bills, AV tech providers continue to tout their services, and legal challenges continue to play out in the courts — with some cases on hold pending the SCOTUS ruling in Paxton.

Arcom Reports Age Verification Enforcement Actions Against 5 Adult Sites

French media regulator Arcom released a statement Tuesday detailing recent actions to enforce age verification rules as set forth under France’s Security and Regulation of the Digital Space (SREN) law.

Ron Jeremy's Accusers Reach Settlement With Rainbow Bar & Grill

The Rainbow Bar & Grill has reached confidential settlements with a group of women who filed a negligence lawsuit against the Sunset Strip restaurant over alleged sexual assaults committed by Ron Jeremy, according to Rolling Stone.

Sportsheets Joins FSC as Gold Member

Sportsheets has joined Free Speech Coalition (FSC) as a Gold-level member.

AV Bulletin: Two End Runs, Two Failed Bills

Industry stakeholders and free speech advocates have anxiously been awaiting the Supreme Court’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, which could significantly impact state age verification laws around the country. In the meantime, state legislatures continue to weigh and pass AV bills, AV tech providers continue to tout their services, and legal challenges continue to play out in the courts — with some cases on hold pending the SCOTUS ruling in Paxton.

FSC Helps Defeat Colorado AV Bill

Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has announced that, with its help, Colorado's recently introduced age verification bill has been defeated.

Missouri AG Bypasses Legislature, Declares Age Verification Rule

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey on Wednesday announced a new state regulation requiring adult sites to implement age verification of users, bypassing the legislative process in a strategy not seen before in state-level efforts to mandate age verification.

Attorney Corey D. Silverstein Launches 'Q&A Series' on Social Media

Adult industry attorney Corey D. Silverstein has launched a Q&A series on his social media platforms.

'Over the Top' North Carolina Bill Could Play Havoc With Adult Sites

A bill filed in the North Carolina state Assembly on Monday would impose new rules that industry observers warn could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Swedish Government Proposes Ban on Purchasing 'Remote' Sexual Services

The Swedish government has asked the country’s Parliament to amend Swedish law so that current laws against purchasing sexual services would also apply to acts performed remotely by cammers, streamers and custom content creators.

Show More