Senate Proposes Patent Overhaul

WASHINGTON — Adult webmasters who develop, use and license the technology that drives porn online may soon find themselves operating under a different set of rules, if a recently introduced bill that overhauls the U.S. patent system becomes law.

The Patent Reform Act of 2006 was introduced by Sens. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, and Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., who co-chair the U.S. Senate’s intellectual property panel.

According to Leahy, the 45-page piece of legislation, which was the culmination of more than two years of hearings and debates, is “not an option, but a necessity.”

One major Leahy-backed reform that could turn the existing regime on its head is the abandonment of the so-called “first to invent” method of awarding a patent.

Under the current law, patents are awarded on a “first to invent” priority basis, a process many observers criticize as unfair because proving who invented a particular technology first is often difficult.

The proposed law change would shift the U.S. patent system to a “first to file” method, bringing America inline with most foreign countries.

U.S. Patent Office chief Jon Dudas, who called for the shift in April of 2005, welcomed the proposed change, saying at the time that adopting the “first to file” method would help clear the office’s backlog of 490,000 applications.

The U.S. Patent Office employs 4,400 patent examiners and approves more than 500 patents per day.

Also endorsed by the U.S. Patent Office is a measure designed to cut down on costly patent infringement litigation.

The new measure would establish a “post-grant opposition” system. Under the proposed dispute resolution process, those seeking to challenge a patent could do so before a board of administrative judges within the Patent Office, rather than filing a lawsuit in court.

News site TechDirt.com, which rated the bill a “mixed bag,” lauded the idea of making patents easier to challenge, but pointed out that the proposed process has several flaws, namely the limited one-year window to challenge a patent.

Taking further aim at contentious patent infringement litigation, the bill seeks to limit the practice known as forum shopping, whereby patent plaintiffs seek out favorable judges to hear their cases.

Under the present system, many patent infringement plaintiffs maneuver their cases to a federal courthouse in the East Texas town of Marshall where Judge John Ward has developed a reputation for speedy trials where the plaintiff — the patent holder — nearly always wins, taking in huge awards.

The bill also seeks to trim the awards in patent infringement litigation by mandating that judges calculate damages based solely on the economic value of the “novel and nonobvious features” covered by the disputed patent. The current system lets judges determine damages based on the value of the product taken as a whole.

The Senate bill drew praise from the Coalition for Patent Fairness, a recently formed group consisting of technology companies such as Dell, Intel, Apple and Microsoft.

Meanwhile, the Professional Inventors Alliance, a group that represents independent inventors, called the bill a “wish list for antipatent, washed-up technology company,” adding that the legislation diminishes protections for individual inventors.

The Professional Inventors Alliance President Ron Riley said that “the bill would reward those who can afford to file quickly and often.”

Hatch and Leahy, who called the bill a first effort, will push the measure when the Senate returns from its summer recess.

Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, introduced a similar bill in the House last summer.

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Politicians Aim to Study Effects of FOSTA-SESTA on Sex Workers

In an encouraging sign for sex workers, California State Representative Ro Khanna and U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts have reintroduced the SAFE SEX Workers Study Act, which aims to study the effects of FOSTA-SESTA.

Texas Bill Aims to Ban Sex Toys at 'Big-Box' Retailers

Republican State Representative Hillary Hickland has introduced a bill in the Texas legislature that would restrict the sale of pleasure products at "big-box" and other non-adult retailers.

U.S. Solicitor General to Participate in FSC v Paxton

The Supreme Court on Monday granted a motion by the U.S. solicitor general to participate in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the case challenging Texas’ controversial age verification law.

Judge Pauses Lawsuit Over Indiana AV Law

A U.S. district court judge has paused a lawsuit over Indiana’s age verification law, pending the Supreme Court's ruling in the Free Speech Coalition-led challenge to Texas’ age verification law, HB 1181.

ASACP Urges Compliance With UK Online Safety Act

LOS ANGELES — The Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection (ASACP) has issued a statement advising adult companies to prepare to comply with the age assurance provisions of the U.K.'s Online Safety Act, which go into effect in 2025.

Pornhub Rejects Claim It Plans to 'Avoid' Age Verification in UK

Pornhub parent company Aylo told XBIZ on Monday that a recent report claiming the site will use a “loophole” to sidestep age verification requirements under the U.K.’s Online Safety Act is “misleading,” and that the company will always ensure its sites are compliant.

FSC Sues Tennessee Over AV Law, Seeks Preliminary Injunction

Free Speech Coalition, along with a group of adult industry stakeholders, has filed a legal challenge to Tennessee’s age verification law and requested an expedited preliminary injunction against enforcement.

Satisfyer Helps Dutch Police Dismantle Counterfeit Network

Satisfyer has teamed up with Dutch authorities to help dismantle a counterfeit network that sold fake products online, including items purporting to be the brand's Pro 2 and Penguin vibrators.

Indiana, Ohio AGs File Amicus Brief in Support of Texas AV Law

Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita, along with Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost and officials from 22 other states, on Friday filed an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law.

Kansas Law Firm Deploys Religion, Bunk Science While Recruiting Plaintiffs Under AV Law

Kansas-based personal injury law firm Mann Wyatt Tanksley is promoting debunked scientific theories and leveraging religious affiliation against the industry while it seeks potential plaintiffs for lawsuits against adult companies under the state’s age verification law.

Show More