Alito Sworn In as Justice After 58-42 Party Line Vote

WASHINGTON —Samuel Alito Jr., who has been widely praised for his intellect and integrity but both admired and assailed for his conservative judicial philosophy, was sworn in today as the 110th justice in the history of the U.S. Supreme Court.

The ceremony, held at the Supreme Court, came shortly after Alito was confirmed by a sharply divided Senate, which voted 58 to 42, largely along party lines.

Alito's supporters have described him as a jurist who would not seek to undo the work of legislators and adopt his own agenda. His detractors say he has consistently sided with big government and big business, and that he does not believe a woman has a right to an abortion.

But attorney Lawrence Walters expressed significant concern about Alito’s appointment.

“The adult industry and the attorneys that represent it must be very careful which cases they bring to the Supreme Court in this new era," Walters told XBiz. "We can no longer assume that existing First Amendment precedent is going to be followed by this Court. With the previous makeup of the Court … there were always a few dissenters when it came to upholding the rights of the adult industry, but we could assume the basic principles would be followed — like the fact that sexually explicit speech is presumed to be protected by the First Amendment. We can't be so sure about that anymore with Alito's confirmation and the conservative majority it brings to the High Court.”

However, Walters also added that Alito can not pursue any "actions" against the adult industry because he is not a prosecutor.

“He just judges cases that are brought to him, along with the other Justices,” Walters told XBiz. “The problem is, he replaces [Sandra Day] O'Connor, the swing vote, which kept the court in balance.”

In a news conference after the vote, some Republicans noted the partisan fight that had ensued over the Alito nomination, especially over the concern about how the judge would rule on cases involving abortion rights.

"There have been a great many concerns raised about how [Alito] is going to vote on specific cases," Sen. Arlen Specter said, the Republican chairman of the Judiciary Committee. "[A]nd we have seen in the long history of the court that there's no way to determine in advance how a nominee is going to vote."

Among two Republican supporters of abortion rights, Senators Olympia J. Snowe of Maine voted for Alito, while Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island voted no, the only Republican to do so. Senator James Jeffords of Vermont, an independent, voted against the nomination.

Alito also won the support of four Democrats: Robert C. Byrd of West Virginia, Ben Nelson of Nebraska, Tim Johnson of South Dakota and Kent Conrad of North Dakota.

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-New York, added later, "I must say that I wish the president was in a position to do more than claim a partisan victory tonight. The union would be better and stronger and more unified if we were confirming a different nominee, a nominee who could have united us more than divided us.”

Alito, who sat as a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for some 15 years, is only 55 and could sit on the Supreme Court for decades.

Alito earned his bachelor’s degree at Princeton, then attended law school at Yale Law School, graduating in 1972 and receiving a military commission through the school’s R.O.T.C. program. He served three months on active duty in 1975, though he remained in the Army Reserve until 1980. Before the first President Bush elevated him to the appeals court in 1990, he worked mostly as a government lawyer in a number of positions in Washington and New Jersey, including a stint as U.S. attorney there.

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Project 2025 Leader Claims Big Tech Companies 'Deliberately Fuel Pornography Addiction' Among Men

Heritage Foundation president and Project 2025 leader Kevin Roberts published on Wednesday the text of a speech in which he persists with his past claim that “predatory Big Tech corporations” are “deliberately fueling pornography addiction” among young men.

FSC Petitions 10th Circuit for Review of Utah AV Dismissal

Free Speech Coalition (FSC) on Wednesday petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit to review a decision handed down earlier this month by a three-judge panel of the same appeals court, which denied FSC the right to challenge Utah’s controversial age verification law by suing state officials.

MyAdultAttorney's Corey D. Silverstein to Hold Post-Election Legal Impact Webinar

Industry attorney Corey D. Silverstein will hold a “Legal Impact” webinar titled “We Have a New U.S. President: Legal and Community Implications” on Nov. 12 at 1 p.m. PST.

Pornhub Shuts Down Access in Oklahoma Over Age Verification

Aylo began geo-blocking Pornhub across Oklahoma on Tuesday, three days in advance of the state’s new age verification law, SB 1959, taking effect.

Florida Age Verification Law Faces Legal Challenge

Tech industry trade groups NetChoice and the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) filed a lawsuit Monday challenging Florida’s HB 3, which includes a requirement for adult websites to verify the age of site visitors in the state.

Scotland Pushes Partnership With Anti-Porn Activist Who Thinks Sex Workers Are 'Possessed by the Devil'

A leading sex worker advocacy group in the U.K. reports that the Scottish government has instructed local authorities to partner with controversial Christian charity Azalea, led by a religious anti-porn activist who has stated that sex workers are “possessed by demons.”

#HandsOffMyPorn Campaign Ramps Up Anti-Project 2025 Ads on Barstool Sports, Similar Sites

The digital ad campaign #HandsOffMyPorn will up its spend from $200,000 to $500,000, and run all-new pre-roll spots on male-centric websites like Barstool Sports, GQ, Men's Health and Bleacher Report.

'Daily Caller' Column Condemns 'e-Harlots,' Urges 'Nuking' Porn Sites

In a column published Friday, the Tucker Carlson-founded right-wing news site Daily Caller advocates for the censorship of adult content, using extremely derogatory terms to describe adult creators and calling for “nuking” porn sites to achieve a “complete and total shutdown.”

UK Government Report Downplays Online Safety Act's Potential Impact on Porn Sites

The U.K. government released on Wednesday a new report assessing the likely impact of implementing the provisions of the controversial Online Safety Act (OSA), revealing adult industry concerns that a standalone provision directly targeting porn sites will render their operation in the U.K. “not feasible.”

'European Conservative' Editor Urges Total Porn Ban

One of Europe’s leading right-wing publications, the European Conservative, published an editorial this week claiming that “anti-porn activists have essentially won the public argument that pornography is poisoning our society” and calling for a total porn ban.

Show More