educational

Constitutional Obscenity?

In a few short hours, the Senate Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Constitution, Civil Rights, and Property Rights will hold a hearing in Washington, DC on "Obscenity Prosecution and the Constitution" – a hearing which will only hear one side of the debate...

As previously reported by XBiz, United States Senator Sam Brownback, a prominent politician involved with the anti-adult entertainment movement, has scheduled the congressional hearing to examine the repercussions of the recently dismissed federal obscenity charges leveled at Extreme Associates and its owners; and to find a way to overcome this unexpected, precedent-setting decision, that some observers see as a death-knell for federal obscenity prosecutions.

The controversy surrounding the Extreme Associates case stems from a decision by U.S. District Judge Gary Lancaster to dismiss the charges of distribution of obscene materials that had been brought against Extreme Associates, and its owners, Rob Black and his wife Janet Romano; stating that laws inhibiting a person's rights to possess obscene material in their own home violate constitutional rights to privacy and liberty.

"We find that the federal obscenity statutes burden an individual's fundamental right to possess, read, observe and think about what he chooses in the privacy of his own home by completely banning the distribution of obscene materials," Lancaster wrote in his 45-page opinion – an opinion which has led to today's hearings.

The judge's decision, which was widely heralded as a victory for free speech rights, was seen by Senators Brownback and Orrin Hatch as "a Frankenstein's monster of judicial activism" – a monster the Senators hope to tame.

The witness list for this hearing has been described as "unfriendly" to our industry, and includes Robert Destro, J.D., Professor of Law for the Catholic University of America, at the Columbus School of Law, in Washington, DC, William Wagner, J.D., Associate Professor of Law at The Thomas M. Cooley Law School in Lansing, Michigan, and Frederick Schauer, J.D., a Frank Stanton Professor of the First Amendment from the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

"Once again, the adult entertainment industry - the clear target of the hearing - was neither invited nor notified of the hearing, and attempts to provide witnesses friendly to the adult industry were rebuffed by subcommittee officials," said Michelle Freridge of the adult industry trade association Free Speech Coalition.

"Free Speech Coalition will see to it that objective and professional written testimony from prominent, knowledgeable and seasoned First Amendment attorneys is included in the subcommittee's record, in order that the U.S. Senate be made aware of all sides of this very important issue," added Freridge.

Scheduled to be held in Room 226 of the Senate Dirksen Office Building, the hearing will begin at 3:00 p.m. today rather than the previously scheduled time of 2:30 p.m., and all of you who are able to attend are encouraged to do so. For those of you unable to attend the hearing, you can tune into the live webcast to hear the testimony first hand.

The outcome of this hearing, and any subsequent actions, could have a profound impact on our industry, and I encourage all of you to listen in and hear the discussion "first hand" – it's your business, take steps to protect it.

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

opinion

Goodbye to Noncompete Agreements in the US?

A noncompetition agreement, also known as a noncompete clause or covenant not to compete, is a contract between an employer and an employee, or between two companies.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

Compliance With State Age Verification Laws

During the past year, website operators have faced a slew of new state age verification laws entailing a variety of inconsistent compliance obligations.

Lawrence Walters ·
opinion

The Perils of Relying on ChatGPT for Legal Advice

It surprised me how many people admitted that they had used ChatGPT or similar services either to draft legal documents or to provide legal advice. “Surprised” is probably an understatement of my reaction to learning about this, as “horrified” more accurately describes my emotional response.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

The Continuous Journey of Legal Compliance in Adult

The adult entertainment industry is teeming with opportunity but is also fraught with challenges, from anticipating consumer behavior to keeping up with technological innovation. The most labyrinthine of all challenges, however, is the world of legal compliance.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

Raising Awareness and Taking Action Against Financial Discrimination

While foes of the adult entertainment industry often focus on “moral” concerns and perpetuate social stigmas, another form of attack can be equally or even more damaging: financial discrimination.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

Beyond DMCA Takedowns: Exploring Alternative Avenues

Most content creators recognize that inevitably, their content will be leaked on pirate sites, forums and file lockers. The most responsible and successful creators have therefore implemented a strategy to protect their valuable intellectual property.

Lawrence Walters ·
opinion

AI-Generated Adult Content and the Law

In the near future, more and more adult content creators will stumble across realistic reproductions of their image and likeness posted on platforms or sold on membership sites — content never produced or authorized by the creator.

opinion

FTC Proposes Negative Option Rule Changes

Attention all website operators that sell goods and services on a subscription basis. On March 23, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced proposed amendments to the Negative Option Rule, which governs how businesses can sell goods and services on a subscription basis.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

The Crackdown on 'Dirty Money' & What It Means for You

In late March, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) announced new regulations to take effect January 2024. These rules will require certain types of corporations, limited liability companies and other similar entities registered in the U.S. to report beneficial ownership information.

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

How Sex Trafficking Claims Can Affect the Adult Industry

Numerous online platforms, including Kik, Twitter, Reddit and MindGeek, have been sued by civil claimants seeking to hold them responsible for sex trafficking activities by their users. These lawsuits have significant consequences for adult industry website operators, billing processors and performers.

Lawrence Walters ·
Show More