opinion

Why a Traffic Network Killed a Popular Offering

Why a Traffic Network Killed a Popular Offering

Change begets change. Nothing propagates so fast. If a man habituated to a narrow circle of cares and pleasures, out of which he seldom travels, step beyond it, though for never so brief a space, his departure from the monotonous scene on which he has been an actor of importance would seem to be the signal for instant confusion. The mine which time has slowly dug beneath familiar objects is sprung in an instant; and what was rock before, becomes but sand and dust. — Charles Dickens

We have come a long way from the dawn of mobile, which now is the majority of traffic we sell at JuicyAds every day. I’ll concede that at the start I didn’t see the value in watching porn on a small screen, but mobile was never about the quality of the experience as much as it was about accessibility.

Adapting to change in the marketplace is pretty similar to adapting to change in life. The big life changes are sometimes pretty damn difficult.

Most of us are never a few steps away from our mobile phones, and this is why they are now the majority of the internet experiences. At one point, mobile redirects were the mobile gold rush of the adult industry.

Fortunes were made by advertisers who tapped the most lucrative portions of the traffic. Mobile redirects were once one of the most lucrative traffic types we sold here at JuicyAds, and we have decided to no longer sell them.

As the years went by the mobile carriers made changes and regulations changed in key countries (and this trend is going to continue and probably end poorly for the adult industry).

Combine that with a trend of people using Wi-Fi more. Where I live in Canada, the local mobile company has added Wi-Fi hotspots everywhere to supplement its carrier towers.

The biggest blow however, was Google’s decision to start penalizing publishers for “sneaky redirects” of their traffic. A side effect of mobile redirects was that the “mobile” version of a website simply did not match the “desktop” version seen by Googlebot.

This decision made little difference since most quality publishers had already either developed mobile versions of their websites, or integrated white labels matching their content and design. Either way, it was pretty much the kiss of death for redirects.

Today, most redirects do not come from quality websites. They come from media buyers, networks, or aggregators who want only one thing — to sell them to anyone who will take them. Don’t get me wrong, there’s obviously still some quality redirect traffic to be found.

My sources suggest that pure carrier traffic is still able to be redirected without penalty from Google — but redirecting Wi-Fi will rain fire and brimstone on your SEO keywords and results. For the most part, quality publishers have stopped selling redirects.

Adapting to change in the marketplace is pretty similar to adapting to change in life. The big life changes are sometimes pretty damn difficult.

It’s no secret that my divorce was pretty rough — just go back and read my first year of columns here in XBIZ World. You’ll see the progression of change happen — from breakup, to dating, to meeting “the one” and living in Las Vegas, and then getting married and starting a family. This all within four years, demonstrating that change truly waits for no one.

These are all huge life changes, and like business — even the worst change will often lead to positive things if you let it and if you accept that change is happening whether you like it or not. People are often afraid of change yet excited by it.

Embracing change for JuicyAds instead of balking at it meant a sharp decision based on a new strategy to move forward. We decided to focus on a solution not limited to just redirects.

After several years of planning, a few months ago we suddenly stopped selling mobile redirects to our clients even though it was a very popular traffic type for both our publishers and advertisers. They are still available to clients with existing campaigns, or by special request but they’ve been killed off.

Why did we stop selling the traffic type that was once one of the most profitable? Why would any advertising network opt to refuse traffic when it can be sold to someone? Because things have changed and mobile redirects no longer meet the JuicyAds quality standards — even though it means lost revenue.

Just because there’s money to be made doesn’t mean it’s the right thing for a company to do. Take for example all the money to be made in malware and tech support scams. These types of campaigns run rampant across some other ad providers, and even some highly promoted and seemingly reputable brands.

They are offered as “opt-in” because they are terrible, but some people just can’t say no to making more money. Clearly, some companies care more about money than integrity. Such is the lure of the dark side. To each their own, I suppose.

We spent several years developing our mobile revenue engine called LiquidFire.mobi to replace the buying and selling of mobile redirects between advertisers and publishers.

The solution is now in Phase 1 beta with the full rollout in the coming months. LiquidFire focuses on performance and results for advertisers, and paying publishers well while monetizing all the traffic they send at highest rate possible.

It’s a win for both sides alike who want great earnings — and it works with all types of traffic including banners, pops, or (gasp) redirects. Looking at the bigger picture allowed us to take a problem and solve it with something better.

Juicy Jay is the CEO and founder of JuicyAds, the Sexy Advertising Network. You can follow Jay on Twitter @juicyads, visit JuicyAds.com, or like on Facebook.com/juicyads.

Related:  

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

opinion

Why Cyber Insurance Is Crucial for Adult Businesses

From streaming services and interactive platforms to ecommerce and virtual reality experiences, the adult industry has long stood at the forefront of online innovation. However, the same technology-forward approach that has enabled adult businesses to deliver unique and personalized content to consumers worldwide also exposes them to myriad risks.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

Best Practices for Payment Gateway Security

Securing digital payment transactions is critical for all businesses, but especially those in high-risk industries. Payment gateways are a core component of the digital payment ecosystem, and therefore must follow best practices to keep customer data safe.

Jonathan Corona ·
opinion

Ready for New Visa Acquirer Changes?

Next spring, Visa will roll out the U.S. version of its new Visa Acquirer Monitoring Program (VAMP), which goes into effect April 1, 2025. This follows Visa Europe, which rolled out VAMP back in June. VAMP charts a new path for acquirers to manage fraud and chargeback ratios.

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

How to Halt Hackers as Fraud Attacks Rise

For hackers, it’s often a game of trial and error. Bad actors will perform enumeration and account testing, repeating the same test on a system to look for vulnerabilities — and if you are not equipped with the proper tools, your merchant account could be the next target.

Cathy Beardsley ·
profile

VerifyMy Seeks to Provide Frictionless Online Safety, Compliance Solutions

Before founding VerifyMy, Ryan Shaw was simply looking for an age verification solution for his previous business. The ones he found, however, were too expensive, too difficult to integrate with, or failed to take into account the needs of either the businesses implementing them or the end users who would be required to interact with them.

Alejandro Freixes ·
opinion

How Adult Website Operators Can Cash in on the 'Interchange' Class Action

The Payment Card Interchange Fee Settlement resulted from a landmark antitrust lawsuit involving Visa, Mastercard and several major banks. The case centered around the interchange fees charged to merchants for processing credit and debit card transactions. These fees are set by card networks and are paid by merchants to the banks that issue the cards.

Jonathan Corona ·
opinion

It's Time to Rock the Vote and Make Your Voice Heard

When I worked to defeat California’s Proposition 60 in 2016, our opposition campaign was outspent nearly 10 to 1. Nevertheless, our community came together and garnered enough support and awareness to defeat that harmful, misguided piece of proposed legislation — by more than a million votes.

Siouxsie Q ·
opinion

Staying Compliant to Avoid the Takedown Shakedown

Dealing with complaints is an everyday part of doing business — and a crucial one, since not dealing with them properly can haunt your business in multiple ways. Card brand regulations require every merchant doing business online to have in place a complaint process for reporting content that may be illegal or that violates the card brand rules.

Cathy Beardsley ·
profile

WIA Profile: Patricia Ucros

Born in Bogota, Colombia, Ucros graduated from college with a degree in education. She spent three years teaching third grade, which she enjoyed a lot, before heeding her father’s advice and moving to South Florida.

Women In Adult ·
opinion

Creating Payment Redundancies to Maximize Payout Uptime

During the global CrowdStrike outage that took place toward the end of July, a flawed software update brought air travel and electronic commerce to a grinding halt worldwide. This dramatically underscores the importance of having a backup plan in place for critical infrastructure.

Jonathan Corona ·
Show More