opinion

Et Tu, Google? Porn Takes It Up the Glass.

By now, you know the story: following a flurry of tech-sector news articles about potential adult entertainment applications for Google Glass, Google quietly changed their developer policies on a Saturday morning, just two days before Mikandi – unaware of the change in Google’s policy – announced the release of Tits & Glass, its much anticipated (by tech-sector journalists, at least) maiden app for Glass.

My initial reaction was that while this development sucked a gargantuan set of excessively pungent balls from Mikandi’s perspective, at least they were given the opportunity to exploit the whole scene for publicity, much as some other adult companies did back when Apple first made it clear that porn was not welcome in the App Store.

When it’s all said and done, porn producers both amateur and professional will use Glass to shoot porn, and unless I’m missing something, there’s not a damn thing Google can do to prevent that.

Then it hit me; what I really object to here is something that goes way beyond Mikandi – and well beyond the mobile adult entertainment sector at large, for that matter.

Google has made a lot of hay over the years about its core value, its simple (some might say simplistic) slogan: “Don’t be evil.” It’s one of those things that sounds good on paper, and looks good when accompanied by a smug, knowing grin – the sort of grin one spawns when one has successfully pulled the wool over the eyes of a massive market.

Here’s the thing, Google: censorship is evil, and selective, self-interested corporate censorship is no exception. It’s also far from the only way in which your company has become, let’s face it, pretty goddamn evil.

It’s evil to permit a circumstance in which the rights holders to motion pictures, sound recordings, photographs, etc. query your search engine for their own works, only to find that the top responses are links to sites that are distributing those works illegally.

It’s evil to drive around the streets sucking down data from unsecured wireless connections, and to log that data without anything even remotely resembling permission from, or notice to, the consumers and businesses affected by that little caper.

It’s evil to permit sites that clearly, obviously and unambiguously trade in pirated and counterfeited goods to participate in your advertising network as publishers, thereby not only aiding and abetting in the distribution of illicit goods, but supplying the criminal operators of such sites with a crucial source of revenue.

It’s evil to hold yourself out as a proponent of network neutrality with the one hand, while using the other hand to come to an accord with the Chinese government, allowing the State to censor Google’s search results within China. (Piling a particularly vicious strain of cynicism on top of that particular evil, my sense is that Google struck that agreement not because the company really believed that access to even a limited version of Google would enhance the lives of the Chinese people, but because the company just couldn’t bear the idea of being locked out of such an enormous market.)

It’s evil, not to mention more than a tad hypocritical, to oppose virtually any attempt to strengthen intellectual property protections for online materials while aggressively asserting your own intellectual property rights when it suits you.

Some might say it’s a stretch to call it evil to ban porn apps for Glass, but you know what? Banning porn apps for Glass is evil too.

Banning porn apps for Glass is evil for the same reasons that I consider obscenity laws to be evil. The ban is capricious, paternalistic, vague, overbroad and treats Android users in the aggregate as a bunch of children who need to be protected from their own naïve – and therefor potentially dangerous – inclinations.

Google’s Glass porn ban has another defining trait, one that might not be evil, but certainly isn’t good: the ban is entirely pointless.

Unless Google is contemplating a major change to its broader content and developer policies, Glass will be the only of Google’s platforms from which porn is banned, or regulated in any meaningful way, for that matter.

While porn has never been allowed in Google Play, independent app stores like Mikandi and AdultAppMart are permitted to distribute sexually explicit apps, and as any site operator who has Google Analytics embedded on his sites can tell you, Android users are not exactly shy about browsing porn sites using the on-deck Chrome browser that comes with their tablets and smartphones.

Then, of course, there’s Google itself, the search engine that spawned it all; last I checked, porn was pretty freaking accessible using good ol’ google.com. Let’s put it this way: any parent whose kid can’t figure out how to make porn display right there in the SERPS in response to a Google image search has bigger concerns than the possibility that the child might be a pervert; that child might well be in a persistent vegetative state.

I’m not contending that Google has no ‘right’ to ban porn apps from Glass – its Google’s product and Google can do what it damn well pleases with respect to its own content policies, after all – I’m just disappointed to see a company that professes to be all about giving the people what they want (even if what the people want is a pretty obvious violation of intellectual property law and/or other statutes) decide that it needs to serve as a digital nanny state, albeit one with confounding and highly inconsistent scruples.

There’s one final irony here, as well. When it’s all said and done, porn producers both amateur and professional will use Glass to shoot porn, and unless I’m missing something, there’s not a damn thing Google can do to prevent that.

Even if there’s no advantage to using Glass to shoot porn, it will happen, if for no other reason than some pornographer, somewhere, will want to capitalize on the opportunity presented by getting to thumb his nose at Google, and generate publicity for himself in the process.

Such a brazen publicity stunt might even be a little “evil”… but it’s an evil I can get behind.

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

profile

WIA Profile: Reba Rocket

As chief operating officer and chief marketing officer of Takedown Piracy, long at the forefront of intellectual property protection in adult entertainment, Rocket is dedicated to safeguarding the livelihoods of content creators and producers while fostering a more ethical and sustainable industry.

Women In Adult ·
opinion

Protecting Content Ownership Rights When Using AI

In today’s digital age, content producers have more tools at their disposal than ever before. Among these tools, artificial intelligence (AI) content generation has emerged as a game changer, enabling creators to produce high-quality content quickly and efficiently.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

How Payment Orchestration Can Help Your Business

An emerging payment solution is making waves in the merchant world: the payment orchestration platform (POP). It’s quickly gaining traction as a powerful tool for managing online payments — but questions abound.

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

Fine-Tuning Refund and Cancellation Policies

For adult websites, managing refunds and cancellations isn’t just about customer service. It’s a crucial factor in maintaining compliance with the regulations of payment processors and payment networks such as Visa and Mastercard.

Jonathan Corona ·
profile

WIA Profile: Laurel Bencomo

Born in Cambridge, England but raised in Spain, Laurel Bencomo initially chose to study business at the University of Barcelona simply because it felt familiar — both of her parents are entrepreneurs. She went on to earn a master’s degree in sales and marketing management at the EADA Business School, while working in events for a group of restaurants in Barcelona.

Women In Adult ·
profile

Gregory Dorcel on Building Upon His Brand's Signature Legacy

“Whether reflected in the storyline or the cast or even the locations, the entertainment we deliver is based on fantasy,” he elaborates. “Our business is not, and never has been, reality. People who are buying our content aren’t expecting reality, or direct contact with stars like you can have with OnlyFans,” he says.

Jeff Dana ·
opinion

How to Turn Card Brand Compliance Into Effective Marketing

In the adult sector, compliance is often treated as a gauntlet of mandatory checkboxes. While it’s true that those boxes need to be ticked and regulations must be followed, sites that view compliance strictly as a chore risk missing out on a bigger opportunity.

Jonathan Corona ·
opinion

A Look at the Latest AI Tools for Online Safety

One of the defining challenges for adult businesses is helping to combat the proliferation of illegal or nonconsensual content, as well as preventing minors from accessing inappropriate or harmful material — all the more so because companies or sites unable or unwilling to do so may expose themselves to significant penalties and put their users at risk.

Gavin Worrall ·
opinion

Know When to Drop Domains You Don't Need

Do you own too many domains? If so, you’re not alone. Like other things we accumulate, every registered domain means something to us. Sometimes a domain represents a dream project we have always wanted to do but have never quite gotten around to.

Juicy Jay ·
opinion

Understanding 'Indemnification' in Business Contracts

Clients frequently tell me that they didn’t understand — or sometimes, even read — certain portions of a contract because those sections appeared to be just “standard legalese.” They are referring, of course, to the specialized language used in legal documents, including contracts.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
Show More